![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The following legal announcement of this project regarding last public comment period ending July 24th was in the Enumclaw Courier-Herald June 24th.
Legal Notices Request for Comments USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Pierce County, Washington Greenwater Floodplain Restoration The environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed Greenwater Floodplain Restoration project is available for review and comment. The proposal would partially restore a 3.5 mile reach of the Greenwater River floodplain by obliterating approximately 3,830 feet of an abandoned section of Forest Road 70 and 670 feet of Forest Road 7000-002. The project would also install 16 engineered log jams to partially restore hydraulic, geomorphic, and habitat complexity in the Greenwater River between mile posts 5.3 and 7.8. The project is located in Pierce County, in the Greenwater River watershed, east of Greenwater, Washington in T19N, R10E, sections 20-22. Comments on the EA will be accepted for 30 days following publication of this legal notice. Only those who submit timely and substantive comments will be accepted as appellants. Comments may be submitted by letter, telephone, e-mail, fax, or office visit. Comments received in response to this notice, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the Project Record and available for public review. E-mail comments must be in message, text, .doc, .rtf, or .pdf format. Send comments to: District Ranger, Snoqualmie Ranger District, 902 SE North Bend Way, Building #1, North Bend, WA 98045, (425) 888-1421, fax (425) 888-1910, E-mail comments may be sent to comments-pacificnorthwest-snoqualmie...lmie@fs.fed.us Comments can be hand-delivered to the District Ranger's office at the above address during business hours. The EA is also available on the Internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/mbs/projects/ For further information, contact team leader Barry Gall at (360) 677-2414, ext. 636. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Look here for information on the Restoration project: http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/mbs/projects...on/index.shtml
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Excerpt from the linked PDF file explaining some of the proposed project
Quote:
Here is the PDF file: http://explore-greenwater.com/pix/Gr...rInfoFlyer.pdf Some in the community are concerned that these log jams could cause increased risk of flooding and put the bridge over the Greenwater river at risk. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sent by Email To:
District Ranger, Snoqualmie Ranger District 902 SE North Bend Way Building #1 North Bend, WA 98045 (425) 888-1421 fax (425) 888-1910, bgall@fs.fed.us John Wise Mayor City of Enumclaw johnwise@ci.enumclaw.wa.us . Reagan Dunn King County Councilmember Council District 9 516 Third Ave. Rm. 1200 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206-296-1009 Toll Free: 800-325-6165 TTY/TDD: 206-296-1024 Fax: 206-296-0198 reagan.dunn@kingcounty.gov Shawn Bunney Pierce County Council 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Tacoma, WA 98402-2176 (253) 798-3635 FAX (253) 798-7509 sbunney@co.pierce.wa.us Christopher Hurst 31st Legislative District Olympia Office: 314 John L. O'Brien Building PO Box 40600 Olympia, WA 98504-0600 (360) 786-7866 Hurst.Christopher@leg.wa.gov CC to James Neff Investigations Editor Seattle Times 206-464-2285 jneff@seattletimes.com Jeff Mayor Area Reporter Tacoma News Tribune jeff.mayor@thenewstribune.com Michelle Nicolosi SeattlePI.com michellenicolosi@seattlepi.com Kevin Hanson Editor Enumclaw Courier Herald P.O. Box 157 Enumclaw, WA 98022 360-802-8206 khanson@courierherald.com Dear Sirs, The US Forest Service is proposing a habitat restoration project on part of the Greenwater River. The plan is called the “Greenwater Floodplain Restoration Project,” and is stated as being organized by the US Forest Service in collaboration with the South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group and Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. The US Forest Service has established a web site that provides details for this project. A link to that site can be found here: http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/mbs/projects...on/index.shtml According to some Greenwater residents, there was no organized effort to inform local residents of this project, including residents directly affected by this project. Many property owners whose property abuts the Greenwater river were not informed. One of my neighbors found a reference to the project proposal in the Enumclaw Courier Herald Newspaper, dated June 24, 2009, under Legal Public Notices. She recently sent a copy of the notice to me by way of email. Part of the proposed project is to construct 16 engineered log jams along a 3.5 mile reach of the Greenwater River. According to some with expertise on the topic, including notably the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, this kind of log jam has a known and studied history of failure over time. Here is an example of the risks as stated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: Risk Engineered log jams pose inherent risks to infrastructure and human stream users. These risks include: · safety hazards caused by the log jams or the cables that anchor them (this risk can be somewhat reduced by placing warning signs upstream from the log jams to alert boaters), · blockage of culverts or bridge openings by large woody debris that has been dislodged from a log jam upstream, · unanticipated erosion across the channel or to the adjacent streambank, · increased channel roughness and constriction, and/or · increased flood stage. Source: http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/ahg/shrg505.pdf (p.6) When this kind of log jam fails, typically during high water volume storm events, the engineered log jam may travel a way down river and become in effect an engineering failure turned disaster. If one or more of these proposed log jams were to block a portion of a river, or become lodged against a bridge footing, the force of the flood water would soon be redirected around and/or over the jam, with likely ruinous results for nearby property. I have concern in two areas regarding this proposal. My first concern is for my neighbors, who were not properly informed of this plan. My second concern is regarding a bridge a little downstream of this proposed restoration project, that may be put at risk. This is bridge number 410-125, found on SR-410 between mile post 42 and mile post 43, in King County. The bridge was last inspected in 2008. The bridge is a concrete T beam construction, built in 1932, and identified as “functionally obsolete” by the State DOT due to non-compliance with current building code. The bridge is considered to be in good shape given that it is 77 years old. There has been some rip-rap added by one of the footings under the bridge, due to erosion. Until about 5 years ago, storm related timber buildup by the bridge was removed by Greenwater local Mr. Mel Southworth. Mr. Southworth performed this service for many years, often as a volunteer and also as a paid contractor. Mr. Southworth recently stopped performing this service. Neighbors are concerned that storm debris related watch on the bridge may have become inconsistent due to many years of local monitoring and maintenance. This bridge provides access for up to 2 million people per year who transit the area. Were the bridge to become damaged, visitors and the local residents of Greenwater, Crystal Village, Crystal River Ranch, Silver Springs, Crystal Mountain plus the Northeast entrance of Mt. Rainier National Park would be 100% inaccessible by motor vehicle for about 6 months of the year. Clearly this bridge is critical providing access to this area. I contacted someone in a field office of our State DOT. He said that typically the Department of Fish and Wildlife provides management for these restoration projects. He added that the Department of Fish and Wildlife does not necessarily check with State DOT on potential impacts of Fish and Wildlife projects. Furthermore, accordingly, the Department of Fish and Wildlife may pursue a project without requesting feedback from the State DOT about the potential impact of their projects to the transportation system. I don’t know if the Department of Fish and Wildlife is playing a role in this project. Someone with engineering knowledge of bridges and bridge maintenance should be part of this process. I am asking your help for two goals. One is to provide an extension for the time to comment, and the other is to help secure a responsible state certified group to inspect and provide an analysis for this Floodplain Restoration, with regard to potential impacts on my neighbors properties and the Greenwater bridge. The time for comment on this project is very short, ending July 24, 2009, and given the urgency, I seek assistance from those who might be best able to help. In addition, I request information, regarding: 1. Documentation regarding the risks of engineered log jam failure and also documentation regarding who will be responsible for maintenance and/or remedial action. 2. I request that each of the logs used in constructing these proposed 16 engineered log jams be permanently branded to help identify them. Lastly, kindly understand that I think this renovation project is good for the river, but it is vital that any risks for the home owners and the bridge be clearly addressed prior to moving the project forward. Due to the short time before the comment period ends, I request that you acknowledge receipt of this request prior to July 25, 2009. Thank you for your time and assistance. Sincerely Tracy Lebenzon |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
As a result of comments from some in the community, the organizers and engineers of the Greenwater River ELJ and Floodplain Restoration Project have arranged to hold a community meeting at the Greenwater Community Center to explain their plans for the river project. There will be several specialists to make a presentation and to provide feedback on the project.
This is probably the last public opportunity to discuss the benefits and risks of this project. Most agree that the floodplain restoration project is a good idea in the abstract. Property owners along the river have reasonable concerns about the risks this may propose to their property. In addition, many are concerned about the risks this project may present to the SR-410 bridge that spans the Greenwater river. Additional concerns are about maintenance for the proposed engineered log jams (ELJ), and there are concerns about identifying these ELJ’s in the event that they fail due to age or flooding. The Greenwater community in particular as well as those with an interest in this type of project are invited and encouraged to attend. Click on this link to display a PDF file that shows the project overview. Note you will need Adobe's Acrobat Reader or the equivalent to view the PDF file. The meeting will take place at 3 PM on August 22, 2009 at the Greenwater Community Center. This is located in the same building as the Greenwater Fire Department. Plan to arrive a little early. Hope to see you there! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|